Regulatory & compliance (AML/KYC, sanctions) is the framework that helps Swiss businesses avoid prohibited relationships, prevent illicit funds risk, and meet due-diligence expectations from banks, auditors, counterparties, and regulators. For many Swiss companies, the biggest exposure is not only “being regulated” — it is being de-banked, blocked in payments, or rejected by partners because governance and screening are weak.
In Switzerland, AML obligations sit primarily under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) and related ordinances, with supervisory oversight by FINMA for many regulated institutions and indirect oversight routes for certain supervised segments.
Sanctions compliance is based on the Embargo Act (EmbA) as a framework law, implemented via specific ordinances; in practice, SECO is central for sanctions/embargo administration and queries.
What this service covers
Our advisory/structuring work typically includes:
-
Regulatory scoping: whether your activity qualifies as a financial intermediary or triggers AML duties, and what your “real-world” compliance obligations are
-
AML/KYC framework: policies, onboarding standards, beneficial owner logic, risk rating, monitoring rules, recordkeeping
-
Sanctions compliance: screening architecture, escalation workflows, contractual protections, and operations-safe implementation
-
Governance and evidence: board-level accountability, audit-ready files, and a defensible compliance trail
-
Cross-border interface: alignment with EU/UK/US partner expectations where required (without overbuilding)
Who this is for
This service is a strong fit for businesses that are:
-
Regulated or near-regulated (financial services, trustees/asset managers under Swiss frameworks, payment flows, crypto-adjacent models)
-
International-facing (cross-border customers, suppliers, or financing)
-
Bank-dependent (new account opening, payment provider onboarding, credit facilities, trade finance)
-
Operating in higher-risk sectors (trading, commodities, intermediaries, high-ticket goods, complex ownership chains)
-
Preparing for audit, investment, M&A, or a major commercial partnership where AML/sanctions questionnaires are part of due diligence
FINMA guidance confirms it monitors AML adherence within its prudential supervision perimeter and, for some supervised segments (e.g., portfolio managers and trustees), via supervisory organisations.
What “AML/KYC” means in practice (Swiss approach)
A practical Swiss AML/KYC framework usually consists of:
1) Customer identification and beneficial ownership
The core requirement is to identify the contracting party and establish/verify the beneficial owner with due diligence appropriate to the circumstances, supported by documentation and consistent files.
2) Risk classification and customer profile
A usable framework defines what “high risk” looks like for your model (jurisdictions, industries, complex structures, unusual payment patterns), and translates it into an onboarding checklist and approval thresholds.
3) Transaction monitoring and escalation
Monitoring must be proportional to your risk profile. The key operational outcome is a clear escalation workflow: what gets flagged, who decides, and how decisions are documented.
4) Suspicious activity reporting discipline
Where reporting is required, Switzerland’s Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) is the FIU within fedpol, and suspicious activity reports are submitted through goAML.
5) Recordkeeping and audit readiness
A Swiss-compliant program is evidence-driven: onboarding file, ongoing monitoring logs, approvals, and a controlled archive.
Sanctions compliance in Switzerland (EmbA / SECO reality)
Swiss sanctions are implemented under the Embargo Act (EmbA) as a framework law, with concrete measures set by ordinances (e.g., country regimes, sector restrictions, asset freezes).
In practice, SECO is central to sanctions/embargo administration and handles requests/inquiries, and is widely recognised as the primary authority in Swiss sanctions implementation and enforcement practice.
A sanctions-ready business typically needs:
-
Screening: customers, beneficial owners, directors/signatories, key counterparties, and (where relevant) goods/services and destination risk
-
Controls: when to block, when to pause delivery, when to escalate to legal/compliance
-
Contract protections: sanctions clauses, termination rights, information duties, and warranties
-
Operational playbook: how payments, shipments, and services are handled when a match is flagged
What you gain from a structured AML/sanctions setup
-
Banking and payment continuity: fewer onboarding delays, fewer compliance escalations
-
Lower enforcement risk: decisions are documented and defensible
-
Faster cross-border deals: partner questionnaires and due diligence are easier to satisfy
-
Operational speed: your team knows what to do when a red flag appears
-
Board-grade governance: clear accountability and approval thresholds
How we deliver the service
-
Regulatory and risk diagnostic
We map your business model, payment flows, jurisdictions, customers, products, and counterparties to identify AML/sanctions exposure. -
Framework design (proportionate, premium)
We design a compliance architecture that fits your reality: not “copy-paste policies”, but workable controls. -
Policy + procedure pack
You receive a complete set of policies, checklists, approval rules, and evidence standards (including onboarding file structure). -
Screening and workflow implementation
We define screening scope, escalation paths, documentation rules, and who signs off on high-risk cases. -
Testing and stabilisation
We run scenario tests (false positives, true matches, unusual payments), refine the playbook, and lock the routine.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
1) Are all Swiss companies subject to AMLA?
No. AML duties typically attach to defined categories (e.g., financial intermediaries). Many “non-regulated” companies still need AML-grade controls because banks and counterparties require them in practice.
2) What is the biggest reason banks reject Swiss onboarding?
Weak beneficial ownership clarity, unclear source-of-funds narratives, missing documentation, and inconsistent screening controls.
3) Do we need sanctions screening if we only sell services?
Often yes. Sanctions can apply to counterparties and prohibited services, not only physical goods. A sanctions clause and screening workflow reduce operational risk under EmbA-based regimes.
4) Who receives suspicious activity reports in Switzerland?
MROS (fedpol) is the FIU, and reports are submitted via goAML.
5) How do you handle beneficial owners in complex structures?
We apply a consistent documentation and verification approach, then tie it to a risk rating and approval thresholds, so decisions remain defensible under AMLA/ordinance expectations.
6) What changes when we expand cross-border?
You usually need stronger screening coverage, clearer source-of-funds/source-of-wealth narratives for higher-risk counterparties, and contract clauses that allow you to pause/terminate safely.
7) Can this be implemented without slowing sales?
Yes, if the program is designed as a tiered workflow: low-risk onboarding stays fast; only higher-risk cases trigger enhanced checks and senior approval.
8) Do you support sanctions enquiries and exception workflows?
Yes. We design the process so escalations are controlled and communications are consistent with SECO practice expectations.
Why choose Yudey Switzerland
-
Business-first compliance: built to protect operations, banking, and revenue
-
Defensible documentation: audit-ready files, clear approvals, evidence discipline
-
Cross-border readiness: suitable for international counterparties and group structures
-
Practical implementation: screening, escalation, and playbooks your team can execute
-
Premium risk control: built for high-value transactions and reputational protection